A vivid $77 million sexual assault and sexual battery lawsuit in opposition to Tyler Perry filed by the identical lawyer behind an identical motion earlier this 12 months is simply extra of the identical seeking a payout, claims the “betrayed” Madea star’s high-profile legal professional.
“Having just lately failed in one other matter in opposition to Mr. Perry, the exact same lawyer has now made one more demand from greater than a decade in the past which can even be a failed cash seize,” Alex Spiro mentioned at the moment of the big-bucks jury-trial-seeking claims from Mario Rodriguez in opposition to Perry and “Boo! A Madea Halloween distributor Lionsgate.
Spiro, who has efficiently repped Alec Baldwin, Jay-Z and plenty of an A-lister over time with a slugger’s strategy, is actually placing forth the narrative of how he needs the Jonathan Delshad-represented Rodriguez’s Los Angeles Superior Court docket case to go down in flames.
There isn’t a denying Rodriguez’s go well with is analogous in tone and format to the continued $260 million sexual harassment and assault go well with initially filed in June in LASC by Delshad for his consumer, The Oval actor Derek Dixon, in opposition to Perry. On the similar time, there isn’t any denying that Rodriguez’s 23-page criticism filed December 25 is filled with probably damning textual content message display screen grabs, remarks about oral intercourse and different suggestive dialog from an allegedly predatory Perry. There are additionally obvious cringey proclamations by the filmmaker like, “You understand Mario, I’m not a nasty individual to know and have in your nook.”
Specializing in the making of Boo! and quite a lot of subsequent meet-ups — comparable to a November 14, 2018 Beverly Hills dinner at Mastro’s Steakhouse to debate extra potential roles for mannequin Rodriguez that noticed a cameo of kinds from John Cena — the criticism can also be filled with graphic and particular particulars. “Mr. Perry reached into Mr. Rodriguez’s underwear and grabbed his penis,” the submitting exclaims of an alleged assault eight years in the past. “Mr. Perry was making sexual moaning noises and saying, ‘Keep right here, keep right here,’ whereas he pressed his physique in opposition to Mr. Rodriguez and continued to seize his penis.”
Capping off that alleged incident, the submitting claims Perry “stuffed $5,000.00 in Mr. Rodriguez’s pocket” as the marginally inebriated Rodriguez was ready for an Uber to take him dwelling from Perry’s home. Different alleged makes an attempt by Perry to supply Rodriguez monetary safety and on-screen roles for what the plaintiff understands to be intercourse adopted as much as 2024.
Claiming “PTSD … psychological, emotional and financial accidents” from Perry’s alleged actions in direction of him, Rodriguez (who did play a “excellent wanting faculty pupil” in 2016’s Boo!) and lawyer Delshad have hauled Lionsgate into all this.
Bryan Bedder/Getty Photos
Their argument is disarmingly easy, although with an odd misspelling of the studio’s identify. “Lions Gate ought to have identified of Perry’s misconduct as Perry has had many such allegations made in opposition to him prior to now,” the criticism states. “However for Lions Gate’s failure to behave and implement their morality clauses and different safeguards, the sexual assaults wouldn’t have occurred as Perry wouldn’t have been ready of energy.”
Lionsgate, as it’s really spelled, didn’t reply tonight to Deadline’s request for touch upon the lawsuit and its place in it.
When it comes to somebody who did reply, Spiro could also be swinging in protection of his consumer, however the NYC-based Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan associate just isn’t altogether off the mark along with his robust assertion. Rodriguez determined to take motion along with his claims after a Sean “Diddy” Combs-referencing buddy texted him on June 18 with information of Dixon’s case.
“Mr. Rodriguez realized that Mr. Perry was persevering with to make use of his energy and affect to sexually assault hopeful actors, and, with the voice of others, determined it was time to inform his story, get hold of justice, and eventually cease Mr. Perry,” this week’s submitting says. “When Perry turned conscious that Rodriguez was going to file this motion, Perry as soon as once more reached out to Rodriguez by textual content, telling Rodriguez that Perry did a lot to assist Rodriguez and was that (sic) Perry was feeling betrayed by Rodriguez,” the doc provides.
Apparently, with all of the textual content exchanges displayed in Rodriguez’s submitting, this presumably explosive one just isn’t there to see.
Now, to Spiro’s slamming of Rodriguez by way of Delshad and the Dixon matter, it’s extra nuanced in actuality. As an illustration, the case hasn’t really “failed,” as Spiro claims.
Delshad’s case in opposition to Perry for Dixon hasn’t precisely nosedived, but it surely has had an unconventional path by the authorized system to date. Filed in LASC in June, the matter was pulled from state court docket in California and moved to federal court docket within the Golden State earlier this 12 months. Then Dixon filed to have his case remanded again to LASC. On December 12, a federal choose dominated that Dixon had not proved he had residence within the state and denied the return to state court docket. A consequence of Choose John Walker’s choice was that Dixon’s case was then shifted to federal court docket in Georgia, Perry’s dwelling base.
Sitting with Choose Sarah E. Geraghty within the Peach State the previous two weeks of this vacation season, Dixon’s case hasn’t seen rather more motion. Which suggests, as soon as Woman Justice picks up the tempo and assuming there isn’t any settlement, 2026 might very possible see Tyler Perry preventing dear sexual assault circumstances on two sides of the nation.
