SC Quashes Rape Complaint Saying Promise Of Marriage Alone Does Not Constitute Assault

Final Up to date:September 11, 2025, 00:11 IST

Deeming it “frivolous and vexatious” and a severe abuse of the prison justice system, the Supreme Courtroom dismissed a rape grievance filed 4 years after the alleged incident

The case pertains a person accused of repeatedly raping a girl from 2010 on a promise of marriage. (Picture: PTI/File)

The Supreme Courtroom has dismissed a rape grievance filed 4 years after the alleged incident, deeming it “frivolous and vexatious” and a severe abuse of the prison justice system.

Justices JB Pardiwala and Sandeep Mehta pressured that allegations should “encourage confidence”, cautioning that “summoning any particular person based mostly on frivolous or vexatious complaints may be very severe, because it tarnishes the picture of the particular person towards whom false allegations are levelled”.

The case pertains to a person, who was accused of repeatedly raping a girl from 2010 on a promise of marriage. The grievance was filed in 2014.

The court docket famous the absence of essential particulars reminiscent of dates, places, and witness corroboration, deeming the grievance unreliable and unsupported by proof. Moreover, the complainant’s failure to answer the court docket discover urged a scarcity of seriousness from the outset, it stated.

The SC clarified in regards to the regulation concerning “promise of marriage” circumstances, stating {that a} mere failure to fulfil a wedding promise doesn’t represent rape except it’s confirmed that the promise was made with malicious intent or deceit to take advantage of. If a promise is real but unfulfilled, it doesn’t fall inside the scope of prison legal responsibility, it stated.

The court docket criticised how the decrease judiciary dealt with the matter, stressing that each the trial court docket and the Allahabad Excessive Courtroom erred in permitting the case to proceed regardless of its weak basis. The bench reiterated that complaints missing readability or impartial corroboration mustn’t proceed, and courts should use their energy underneath Part 482 of the Felony Process Code (CrPC) to quash such circumstances.

This ruling aligns with a number of key precedents: within the Jaspal Singh Kaural v State of NCT of Delhi (2025), the court docket held {that a} consensual relationship adopted by a breach in promise doesn’t mechanically qualify as rape except fraudulent intent was current from the start. 

Equally, different judgments have quashed complaints in circumstances involving consensual long-standing relationships the place delays and contradictions have been obvious, reinforcing that disputes rising from relationships shouldn’t be handled as prison offences with out clear prosecutorial proof.

Learn Extra